AI GRC for MSPs and providers

The AI GRC platform built for IT service providers and their client work

Run your clients' risk assessments and compliance on one platform, with AI that prepares the work and consultants who decide.

The GRC challenge for MSPs and IT service providers

As an IT service provider or managed service provider, you handle compliance and risk for several clients, each with its own frameworks, deadlines and maturity level. Multiplying spreadsheets and tools per client drives up your consultants' workload and fragments the overall picture. Without a dedicated multi-client GRC platform, growing your portfolio means a proportional rise in costs and in the risk of error.

How Vailor industrializes your GRC engagements

On Vailor, your consultants run pre-assessments and risk assessments in EBIOS RM or as a flash assessment: the AI reads the client's project documents and prefills, your experts validate. On compliance, the Vailor Control Framework links each control to every framework that asks for it. You keep the same method from one client to the next. Integration partners such as CYNERS can run their clients' GRC activities on Vailor this way.

Why an AI platform built in France is an asset for your firm

A GRC tool whose data is stored in France becomes a selling point with your clients in regulated sectors. As SaaS, data is stored in France (AWS Paris region) and AI processing runs on AWS Bedrock in EU regions. Vailor also installs in your client's infrastructure (Docker), with the AI model of their choice. Data is never used to train models, and both the interface and the deliverables are available in French and English. You turn GRC into a high-value recurring service.

A GRC platform designed for client engagements

AI that works for your consultants

The AI reads project documents and prefills pre-assessments and risk assessments. Your consultants spend their time checking and deciding.

One method across engagements

EBIOS RM at standard or Flash depth, set up for each client: scales, matrices and risk sources are configurable.

Deployment suited to each client

SaaS with data stored in France or installation in the client's infrastructure, with fine-grained rights and an audit log with no delete function.

Data in France as a selling point

As SaaS, data stored in France (AWS Paris region): an asset with your clients in regulated sectors.

The benefits of an AI GRC platform for IT providers

Run pre-assessments, risk assessments and compliance on one platform
Give your consultants more capacity: the AI prepares, they decide
Standardize your methodologies from one client to the next
Deliver PDF, Word and PowerPoint exports and a decision-maker summary
Turn data stored in France into a differentiator
Convert GRC into a high-value recurring service

Frequently asked questions about multi-client GRC

Can a GRC platform be delivered white-label to clients?

Three models coexist and they are not equivalent. Referral, where your client signs directly with the vendor and you invoice your own advisory work. Resale or managed delivery, where you are the one contracting with the vendor, running the platform on your client's behalf and remaining their single point of contact. White labelling in the strict sense, where the tool carries your visual identity. What matters contractually is not the logo: it is who holds the data, who signs the processing agreement the GDPR requires, and what happens to your client's access once the engagement ends. Settle those three points first.

What is a GRC accelerator, and what does it actually accelerate?

The term covers a ready-made baseline: policy templates, a control library, interview questionnaires, mappings between frameworks. Its real value comes from sharing: one security measure described properly serves several frameworks at once, because ISO/IEC 27001, NIS2 and the NIST CSF largely ask for the same practices in different words. That is where the acceleration sits, not in a report template. An accelerator that stops maintaining those mappings when an edition changes turns back into a folder of files within months.

Who stays accountable for compliance, the provider or the client?

Your client does. Outsourcing the work does not move the accountability: the regulated organisation answers to its supervisory authority, and NIS2 goes further by requiring its management bodies to approve the cyber risk management measures and oversee their implementation. Your job is to produce a case that stands without you: dated decisions, evidence attached to a requirement, a named internal owner for every measure. A file that only makes sense with your consultant on the phone is a fragile file.

Can an IT services firm certify its own clients to ISO 27001?

No. An ISO/IEC 27001 certificate is issued by an accredited certification body, and the impartiality rules those bodies work under stop them from certifying a management system they have themselves advised on. The split is clear: you prepare, document, train and run the mock audit; an independent third party audits and decides. Nothing stops you helping your client pick that body and walk into the audit without surprises. Saying so during the sales cycle avoids the most expensive misunderstanding in this business, the client who thought they were buying a certificate.

What does a client check before trusting a third-party GRC tool?

Five points come up in almost every supplier questionnaire, and all of them are legitimate: where the data is hosted, how their scope is isolated from that of your other clients, which further subprocessors are involved, what the vendor does with the content submitted to the AI, and how they get their data back if the relationship ends. On Vailor's side, as SaaS, data is stored in France (AWS Paris region) and AI processing runs on AWS Bedrock in EU regions; the platform can also be installed in your client's infrastructure, and content is never used to train models: that answers the first and fourth points. The others belong in writing, in the contract, not in a meeting.

Why a shared platform rather than one spreadsheet per client?

Because the cost of spreadsheets never shows up on a single engagement, it shows up across the portfolio. Every client ends up with its own variant of the template, nobody knows which one is authoritative, and a simple question becomes a project: which clients are exposed to this new requirement, which ones have a review running late this month? A shared platform applies the same method everywhere, keeps the history of decisions and avoids re-keying the same evidence. On Vailor, the AI also prefills risk assessments from the client's documents.

What does the AI actually take on during a GRC engagement?

In Vailor, it takes on the mechanical part: reading project documents, prefilling the pre-assessment and the risk assessment from excerpts, proposing measures with their effort and cost. Without documents, Vailor organises the collection from business teams with simple questions. What stays with your consultants is exactly what you invoice: choosing the scope, deciding whether to treat or accept a risk, the conversation with the client's leadership, the commitment you sign. AI shifts the effort towards analysis, it does not replace the decision.

Industrialize your GRC engagements

Book 30 minutes: we listen to your context as a service provider and tell you concretely how Vailor fits into your engagements.

Book a demo