Vailor: the sovereign AI-native GRC alternative to Mitratech

Because all three describe the same supplier without ever speaking to each other: a security questionnaire owned by procurement, a requirement to cover on the compliance side, a threat scenario in the risk register. While those objects stay apart, a supplier's answer updates neither your regulatory coverage nor your risk level, and nobody knows which decision follows from it. Connected, they form a single chain: the third party carries a criticality, that criticality feeds a scenario, the scenario justifies a control, and the control produces the evidence an auditor will ask for.

An assessment is only worth the change it triggers. Every gap you find has to be attached to what the third party makes possible: access to your information system, data you entrust to it, an operational dependency. That link is what turns a declarative answer into an assessed risk scenario, then into a treatment plan with a named owner and a due date. In Vailor, the third-party register is already linked to your organisation and assets. AI analysis of questionnaires is planned.

Not on contract value. What matters is what the third party makes possible: the business assets it supports, the data entrusted to it, how deep its access runs, and how easily you could do without it. The EBIOS RM method formalises this reading in its workshop 3, which rates ecosystem stakeholders on dependency, penetration, cyber maturity and the level of trust granted. In Vailor, that workshop is part of the EBIOS RM assessment, and the third-party register shows which assets rely on which suppliers.

Yes, and that is what keeps the workload sustainable. The NIS2 directive calls for supply chain security measures, ISO/IEC 27001 covers supplier relationships among its Annex A controls, and the GDPR requires a contract governing every processor that handles personal data on your behalf. The supplier is the same, the questions overlap heavily, and only the expected wording differs. The point is to attach a single piece of evidence to every requirement it covers, rather than going back to the same third party three times.

By treating an assessment as a state, not as an annual deliverable. Third parties move: a new subcontractor, a certificate that lapses, a publicly disclosed incident, a renegotiated contract. So you need to know at any point which assessment has aged, which requirement is no longer covered and which risk scenario has to be replayed, without redoing everything. Today, Vailor links each third party to your organisation and assets, and a piece of compliance evidence collected once serves every framework that asks for it. Supplier posture tracking and real-time scoring are planned.

Migration starts with the inventory: the list of third parties, the criticality agreed for each, the contract owner, the date of the last assessment, and the related clauses and documents. Those carry over as they are. What gets rebuilt is the linking: which requirement each third party touches, which risk scenario it feeds, which evidence still holds and which has to be requested again. Our teams scope that with you and advise starting with your critical third parties, then extending once the first cycle is closed.