Vailor: the sovereign AI-native GRC alternative to GRChive
An AI-native GRC platform, sovereign and dedicated to cybersecurity.
A GRC platform to unify governance and compliance
GRC solutions centralize governance, risk management and compliance within a shared workspace. If you are evaluating solutions such as GRChive, Vailor offers an AI GRC option built in France for security teams. The AI prepares the work, your experts decide, and every decision is recorded.
Vailor's strengths for your GRC teams
Vailor covers risk analysis in EBIOS RM or as a flash assessment; the AI reads your documents and prefills, your experts validate. The risk register is linked to the measures in the action plan, and for compliance each control is maintained once for all your frameworks. An audit log with no delete function keeps a record of every decision.
Evaluate Vailor and organize your migration
Switching to Vailor happens in stages, with support to get started. Whether you are comparing solutions or planning a transition, our teams map out your journey. Book 30 minutes to talk it through on your own use cases.
Why choose Vailor
The AI proposes, your experts decide
The AI prefills your risk analyses from your documents and cites its sources.
Supported start
Deployment as SaaS or in your own infrastructure, with our team supporting you at the start.
Native EBIOS RM
The EBIOS RM method natively integrated, to run your risk analyses out of the box.
Hosted in France
Hosted in France by default, or installed in your own infrastructure.
What Vailor brings you
Risk register and audit evidence: frequently asked questions
What should a risk register actually contain?
A risk register is not a list of threats. It is the set of links between an asset, a risk scenario, its likelihood and impact levels, the treatment decision taken, the person accountable for it and the residual risk accepted, together with the date of the last review and the reasoning behind each trade-off. ISO/IEC 27005 provides the guidelines for that work, and ISO/IEC 27001 requires documented information on the results of risk assessments to be retained. Without those links, a register records a state without explaining how it was reached.
Why does a risk register go stale between two audits?
Because what it describes changes faster than it does. An asset is decommissioned, a supplier is replaced, a mitigation slips by a quarter, a risk owner moves on. Each of those events should trigger a review and none of them does on its own. Twelve months later the register describes last year's scope. The familiar symptom is the rebuild in the weeks before an audit, which produces a document that is accurate on the day of the audit and wrong for the rest of the year.
What makes audit evidence hold up over time?
Evidence holds up when it is dated, attributable to a named author, attached to the requirement or the control it supports, and retrievable without relying on anyone's memory. The real constraint is duration: an ISO/IEC 27001 certification cycle runs over three years, punctuated by surveillance audits, and an auditor may ask how a decision was reached two years earlier. A screenshot with no timestamp and no context cannot answer that question.
How does Vailor keep the risk register current?
Vailor treats the register as a live object rather than an annual deliverable. Each risk is linked to the measures in the action plan, with their priority, and reminders help keep the pace. On the analysis side, the AI reads the project documents and prefills the fields, citing its sources, and every proposal stays subject to validation. EBIOS RM is covered end to end, so the register does not have to be rebuilt for each new exercise.
How is the audit trail preserved in Vailor?
Every decision is timestamped and attributed in an audit log with no delete function. The audit trail is therefore built as the work happens, not assembled the night before an audit. When the AI contributes, it quotes the passages from your documents it relies on, checked word for word, and nothing is validated without a human: an auditor sees what was kept, by whom and when, and a read-only auditor role gives them access with no risk of changes. Your registers and the supporting evidence are hosted in France by default.
How do we migrate an existing risk register?
The work happens before the switch. Freeze the scope, align the likelihood and impact scales so that levels keep the same meaning, then replay a few known scenarios to check that the results still make sense. Past decisions have to travel with the register and stay attached to the risks they belong to, otherwise the history disappears at the exact moment an auditor asks for it. The move runs in stages, with dedicated support, and without interrupting the audit cycle under way.
Explore AI GRC with Vailor
Our resources on governance, risk and compliance assisted by artificial intelligence.
By role, and to go further
Pages to discover
Recommended articles
ANSSI-labelled EBIOS RM software: the 2026 overview
The EBIOS Risk Manager tools labelled by ANSSI as of 9 October 2026, what the label guarantees, what it does not, and how to check it.
Supply Chain Cyber Risk: How to Manage Your Suppliers
Supply chain cyber risk: what NIS2, DORA and EBIOS RM require, how to map your critical third parties, and what to ask your suppliers before and after signing.
Discover Vailor in a demo
Book 30 minutes and see how Vailor, the sovereign AI-native GRC alternative to GRChive, fits your context.