Vailor: the sovereign AI-native GRC alternative to 6clicks

Three separate levels. Data isolation between clients first: each organisation and each scope carries its own configuration, frameworks and assets, with no overlap. Internal access rights second: a consultant reaches only the engagements they work on, and that rule has to survive team changes. Traceability last: knowing who produced or changed what, and when. In Vailor each entity carries its own settings, fine-grained rights with custom roles decide who reaches what, and an audit log with no delete function traces every change. The level of separation you need between clients is scoped with you, deployment mode included.

By separating what is stable from what belongs to the client. Stable: your assessment grid, your likelihood and impact scales, your deliverable formats, your library of controls. Client specific: the scope, the assets, the applicable frameworks, the third parties. Vailor holds that split in its per-entity settings, so every engagement starts from a shared base (scales, matrices, risk sources) and only the context is adjusted. The pre-assessment then qualifies each project: the full EBIOS RM method for a sensitive project, a flash assessment otherwise.

Industrialised: what is repetitive and checkable. Reading the documents supplied, prefilling the risk assessment, matching requirements against controls, producing the deliverables in PDF, Word or PowerPoint. Human: what carries your advisory responsibility. Scoping the need, deciding which risk is accepted, making the recommendation. The right test is not whether AI can perform a task, but whether you can defend the result in front of your client's steering committee.

This is the pressure point for a growing practice: the deliverable should not depend on who happens to write it. Two levers. A shared methodological base, applied the same way on every engagement. And AI that quotes the passages of the client's documents it relies on, checked word for word and visible to all, with every proposal counting only once a consultant has validated it. A senior review then covers substance instead of reformatting a document.

A useful portfolio view is a view of aggregates: progress per engagement, deadlines coming up, open gaps, workload ahead. It does not need the detailed content of any client file to be usable, and that is exactly what makes it compatible with partitioning. The practical rule: visibility across engagements is granted, never inherited. In Vailor, dashboards combine proposed and custom indicators, and access rights decide who gets the overview and who stays on their engagement.

Engagement by engagement, never as one broad switch. Start with a representative client: switch on the applicable frameworks, bring across the risk register and the controls already in place, run a consistency check, then produce the first deliverable alongside the existing one. That client becomes the template for the next ones, and each takeover gets faster. Settle the history question early: what you genuinely carry over (decisions, dated evidence) and what stays archived where it is. Our teams help scope that.